Update Final Draft of Assignment with comments listed

Teacher and student comments

*Update Final Draft of Assignment 2 (Human Resource Discourse Genre Analysis) with comments listed below.

I really enjoyed the introduction in which you defined what human resources is and how it plays a vital role in the business world. One thing that you could fix in your introduction is when you state the piece you are writing about and say they assess the use of AHP, try to define and elaborate on what AHP so readers like myself can understand its role within human resources. Besides that, the introduction is great! Next in your identification section, you identify all the basic similarities between the two papers such as whether they are MLA or APA and whether they have an introduction or abstract, but I feel like you could expand and identify even more similarities and differences such as word count, number of sections, etc. Also in your last section of the identification portion, I feel like you go more into analysis rather than identifying. To fix this, you can take the ideas from that last paragraph of the identification section and work it into one of the paragraphs of the analysis section. Finally, I believe your reflection you brought up new ideas that could’ve been added to the analysis section. A reflection should merely just restate your main points from both the identification and analysis sections rather than bringing up new points. Overall, your paper could use some work with grammar but the structure and ideas are great! Good job.

writing need help please

Ashford 6: – Week 5 – Final Paper

Final Paper

Select three of the major topics covered throughout the course. Then, analyze the impact these topics can have on the administration of the law enforcement organization. The topics for analysis include:

  • Boston Police Strike of 1919
  • Budget considerations by labor and management
  • Communications and the media
  • Community opinions and support
  • Collective bargaining
  • Ethical considerations for police political involvement
  • History of police labor unions
  • Interest-based problem-solving method
  • Labor relations
  • Office politics
  • Pay, benefits, and pension trends
  • Police labor-management models
  • Police Unionization
  • Political endorsements
  • Politics and police administration

The Final Paper must identify the main issues within the selected areas of reference, depict the new learning that has occurred throughout the course, and relate specific, current, and/or relevant experiences from your past or current workplace and/or organization that demonstrate applicable learning and understanding. The emphasis of the Paper should be the expression of gained knowledge and learning.
The paper must be eight to ten pages in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least five scholarly resources (at least two from the Ashford Online Library) other than the textbook to support your claims and subclaims. Cite your resources in text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar.

Writing the Final Paper
The Final Paper:

  • Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
  • Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
  • Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
  • Must use at least five scholarly resources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford Online Library.
  • Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment. Included below

Description:

Total Possible Score: 26.00

Analyzes the Impact of Topic # 1 on Law Enforcement Administration.

Total: 6.25

Distinguished – Thoroughly analyzes the impact of the chosen topic on Law Enforcement Administration. The analysis depicts new learning by relating specific and relevant experiences that demonstrate applicable understanding.

Proficient – Analyzes the impact of the chosen topic on Law Enforcement Administration. The analysis depicts new learning by relating specific and relevant experiences that demonstrate applicable understanding. The analysis is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Minimally analyzes the impact of the chosen topic on Law Enforcement Administration. The analysis somewhat depicts new learning by relating relevant experiences that demonstrate applicable understanding. The analysis is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to analyzes the impact of the chosen topic on Law Enforcement Administration; however, the analysis does not effectively address the impact of the chosen topic and/or does not effectively demonstrate new learning by relating experiences that demonstrate applicable understanding. The analysis is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The analysis of the impact of topic # 1 on law enforcement administration is non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Analyzes the Impact of Topic # 2 on Law Enforcement Administration.

Total: 6.25

Distinguished – Thoroughly analyzes the impact of the chosen topic on Law Enforcement Administration. The analysis depicts new learning by relating specific and relevant experiences that demonstrate applicable understanding.

Proficient – Analyzes the impact of the chosen topic on Law Enforcement Administration. The analysis depicts new learning by relating specific and relevant experiences that demonstrate applicable understanding. The analysis is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Minimally analyzes the impact of the chosen topic on Law Enforcement Administration. The analysis somewhat depicts new learning by relating relevant experiences that demonstrate applicable understanding. The analysis is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to analyzes the impact of the chosen topic on Law Enforcement Administration; however, the analysis does not effectively address the impact of the chosen topic and/or does not effectively demonstrate new learning by relating experiences that demonstrate applicable understanding. The analysis is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The analysis of the impact of topic # 2 on law enforcement administration is non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Analyzes the Impact of Topic # 3 on Law Enforcement Administration.

Total: 6.25

Distinguished – Thoroughly analyzes the impact of the chosen topic on Law Enforcement Administration. The analysis depicts new learning by relating specific and relevant experiences that demonstrate applicable understanding.

Proficient – Analyzes the impact of the chosen topic on Law Enforcement Administration. The analysis depicts new learning by relating specific and relevant experiences that demonstrate applicable understanding. The analysis is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Minimally analyzes the impact of the chosen topic on Law Enforcement Administration. The analysis somewhat depicts new learning by relating relevant experiences that demonstrate applicable understanding. The analysis is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to analyzes the impact of the chosen topic on Law Enforcement Administration; however, the analysis does not effectively address the impact of the chosen topic and/or does not effectively demonstrate new learning by relating experiences that demonstrate applicable understanding. The analysis is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The analysis of the impact of topic # 3 on law enforcement administration is non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Critical Thinking: Evidence

Total: 1.50

Distinguished – Employs persuasive information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

Proficient – Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.

Basic – Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Below Expectations – Displays information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues

Total: 1.50

Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.

Proficient – Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Below Expectations – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 1.25

Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.

Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.

Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.

Proficient – The paper closely meets the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.

Basic – The paper meets over half of the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.

Below Expectations – A fraction of the page requirement is completed.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Commuication: Resource Requirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient – Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations – Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

  Please make sure there is a introduction with thesis, all in the grading rubic is covered. Conclusion and reference page.  It needs to be eight to ten complete pages. This does not include the title or reference page thanks Any questions feel free to ask. This needs to be good. Thanks, let me know what you decide to write about and I will help find the resources from the ashford library. This needs turned in on time thanks so much, any questions please ask

Organizational Training and Development

I have attached the paper I wrote below and the rubic. I just need it to be corrected so I can resubmit it.

Refer to the Scenario for Assignments 1-5 found here.

Scenario for Assignments 1-5

Assume that you are a training manager at a hypothetical organization where the Director of Human Resources has asked you to develop a training program for the organization’s 200 employees. (Note: You may create and /or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of these assignments. In your original work, you may use aspects of existing training programs from either your current or a former place of employment, or from an organization with which you are familiar. However, in those instances, you must remove any and all identifying information that would enable someone to discern the organization(s) that you have used.). You will need to identify the subject area for your training. You may choose a training program that currently exists but is not meeting the needs of the organization; however, you will need to clearly explain this in your training needs assessment. The training program may focus on the company as a whole or on a specific department. Keep in mind, however, the training is intended to improve the organization’s performance (e.g., bottom line, outcomes).

The first step in the training process is to conduct a training needs analysis (TNA). The TNA consists of three phases: Organizational Analysis, Operational Analysis, and Person Analysis.

When conducting the TNA for your organization, consider the following questions:

  • What areas or steps of the analysis process would you expand for the organization?
  • Are there any areas or steps of the analysis process that you would remove?
  • What data needs to be collected in order to conduct the analysis?

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

1. Revise Assignment 1 based on your professor’s feedback. (Revision is not included in the required page count.)
2. Develop a training needs analysis (TNA) template. Include the methods and tools you would use for the following phases:

  • a. Organizational Analysis
  • b. Operational Analysis (Task or Job Analysis)
  • c. Person Analysis (Audience Analysis)

3. Determine at least three (3) types of questions you need to ask during each phase of the TNA, providing a rationale for the questions.
4. Explain the process of your TNA and any changes or additions you would make to the model provided in the text.
5. Include at least three (3) relevant peer-reviewed references (published within the last five [5] years) from material in addition to the textbook.

Current Events Ethical Issues in the News

Using one of the news websites from the provided list such as; FOX NEWS, CNN, BBC and so on.. search for a current news story (article, other piece of writing, or video clip) that demonstrates a moral or ethical dilemma. Your current news selection must be within the last 90 days. As you read the written work or view the video, reflect and consider all aspects and viewpoints the author provides.

In this activity forum, list the title of the news story and website. Briefly summarize the story and explain the moral or ethical issue/dilemma and how it relates to an ethical theory, principle, and concept or code in the course text. Your response must be at least 200 words and show a clear connection between the news story/event and the course material.

Presentation

Based on the proposal ( I will offer),

1.Write a brief note regarding the purpose statement below (BWC 243)  What do I want the audience to know, to believe, or to do when the presentation is finished?

2.Presentation – Minimum of six slides

Use Contrast, Repetition, Alignment, Proximity and Color.

Chunk information using a balance of the most impactful information as you decide what to include and what not to include.

Make sure you take into consideration the logical sequence and order in which your slides will be presented.

Generally, the bullet point format (talking points), is used for presentations, as the speaker will elaborate while presenting.

Business+Writeru2019s+Companion,+The+-+Gerald+J.+Alred+&%3+Charle….pdf (BWC)      guide for presentation.docx 

guide.docx

Poverty and Inequality Around in Developing Countries Paper

Resources and Guidelines for Briefing Paper

A briefing paper is a concise summary of the published, current scientific knowledge on a topic and is written for an informed, although not necessarily an expert, audience. Briefing papers update readers on an issue’s current status and get readers up-to-speed on the background of an issue. Typically, briefing papers are presented as a 4-page summary. Each paper reaches a clear conclusion based on evidence and concise argument. This tends to result in a pace of writing that could best be described as “swift.” Yet, coherency and substance are the hallmarks of a briefing paper. You can think of these papers as densely written because while they are short, they are full of information. Carefully worded subheadings that point the reader to more detailed information and bulleted points that highlight quick overviews of essential information are two writing conventions that facilitate the swift style of the briefing paper.

Your briefing paper must include:

Title, date, and contact information (name, email, and student ID): 3 lines

Issue: 1 page

• Clearly describe a problem that relates to the poverty and inequality topics presented in the course. Describe what population (i.e., youth, racial/ ethnic minorities, undocumented immigrants, women in underdeveloped countries, etc.) is primarily affected by the problem and how they are affected. Why is the issue so problematic? What are some of the causes and consequences of the issue?

Present and evaluate 2-3 policy solutions: 2 ½ pages

• Present 2-3 policies that may solve the issue that you presented. You do not need to develop your own policy solutions. Rather, you may discuss policies that other researchers or policy advocates have proposed. In your evaluation, be sure to describe the pros and cons of each policy.

Recommendations: 1 page

• Given the policy solutions you discussed, what recommendations do you have for addressing the issue you described? Why is this the best solution?

Works Cited: (not included in final word count)

The briefing should be 4-5 double-spaced pages. Text should be 1,000-1,200 words. Papers with total word counts that are not within the limit listed above will not be graded (total word count does not include works cited). The key is to produce a document that is well-written, accurate, and compelling. This is a valuable skill to develop and is used widely in the government, business, and non-profit sectors.

Here is some helpful information about writing a briefing paper:

http://mason.gmu.edu/~pnorton/hypermedia/briefing….

http://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/cur/socstud/frame_found_sr2/tns/tn-21.pdf

Collaborative Decision Making Through Shared Governance Assignment

Attend a committee meeting in your health care organization. If you are not currently employed in a health care setting, you may elect to attend a committee meeting at another company, a community center, a local school, local chamber of commerce or other professional organization.

Observe the interactions between committee members and the process used by the committee to arrive at decisions.

In 500-750 words, describe the function of the committee and the roles of those in attendance. Describe your observations of the interactions between members of the committee and determine whether the process used to arrive at decisions is a form of shared governance.

A minimum of two academic references from credible sources are required for this assignment.

Submit the completed “Collaborative Committee Meeting Verification Form” with the assignment.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines

I am attend Asian Migration class right now, there is an easy I need help with.

Choose one of the following two options

a) Attend TWO local Asian American events, interview at least 3 participants respectively at EACH event, then write a report (4-5 pages, double-spaced, one-inch margin) to compare and contrast the two events. Information about local Asian cultural events will be updated on MyCourses throughout the semester. You can also choose other events in the region as long as it is about Asian and Asian American culture.

b)Writing a participatory report on an Asian ethnic community in the region (4-5 pages, double-spaced, one-inch margin). It could be Chinatown, Japantown, Little India, or Koreantown in New York or any other community as long as it has a large Asian population living within the area. The report needs to discuss the spatial pattern, residential/commercial types, demographic information of residents, language spoken, and cultural landscapes of the Asian ethnic community.

*I am Chinese student, so if you can write from different angle will be great!

Select two of the articles from the list below and read them carefully and completely, article review help

  1. Select two of the articles from the list below and read them carefully and completely.  All of the articles are about a controversial topic in American History. The article will present two sides of the issue.
  2.  Write two, separate single-spaced reviews of the articles.
  1. The review should have four elements / paragraphs:
  2. Write a one paragraph overview of the issue.
  3. Write a one paragraph summary of one the arguments.
  4. Write a one paragraph summary of the other argument.
  5. In your final paragraph, select which argument you believe is more convincing and explain why.

What Makes an Effective Criminal Investigator?, writing homework help

What Makes an Effective Criminal Investigator?” Please respond to the following:

  • * From the e-Activity, determine the fundamental positive and negative characteristics of a criminal investigator. Include at least two (2) examples from real life or stories from television and newspaper to support your response. Note: Some popular television shows to consider include CSI (Crime Scene Investigation) and CSI: Miami or CSI: New York.
  • Many criminal investigation articles suggest that there are positive and negative benefits to having police investigators specialize in certain fields of expertise (e.g. homicide, robbery). Place yourself in the role of the Chief of Police in an agency with one hundred (100) police officers, five (5) of which are general detectives who investigate every type of crime. Imagine your community is suffering from a rash of homicides. Determine the main pros and cons of training two (2) of the five (5) investigators specifically in homicide investigation in your agency. Provide a rationale to support your response.