ESL433N Grand Canyon Evaluating and Selecting Assessments for ELL Essay

ESL433N Grand Canyon Evaluating and Selecting Assessments for ELL Essay

Need help in an assignment for ELL students. Use the template given.

Details:

Table 1 in the Smith article describes concepts, principles, and checklist items that can be used to evaluate assessments.

Select two of the checklist items you think are important when evaluating assessments for ELL students. In a 500-word essay describe those items within a brief summary of the article to defend why you believe the two items are of particular importance.

Include at least three sources from your reading to support your position.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

.The purpose of this assignment is to consider several aspects of evaluating student work. In Table 1 of the assigned article, you will find 3 columns of information. You are most interested in pinpointing 2 of the items in the 3rd column (Checklist items). You must select the 2 that you feel are most important when evaluating ELLs, and – using current research within the last 5 years – defend your reason for picking each. A minimum of 3 scholarly sources to support your 2 choices is required; the article you read is NOT considered a supporting source since it is the source you are validating.

Assignment 2 Details w/Clarification – Evaluating and Selecting Assessments (essay)

Hi Class,

The following assignment details have been copy/pasted from the Tasks>Assignment>Evaluating and Selecting Assessments page in Loudcloud. I have provided clarification to help you identify key areas of focus so you can concentrate on that content as you complete the assignment. As usual, my comments are in a different color to help you identify them quickly.

Details:

Table 1 in the Smith article (attached in the next post) describes concepts, principles, and checklist items that can be used to evaluate assessments.

Select two (from list of 12) of the checklist items you think are important when evaluating assessments for ELL students. In a 500-word essay (You can go over by 50 words without a penalty) describe those items within a brief summary of the article to defend why you believe the two items are of particular importance.

Include at least three sources from your reading to support your position. Do not forget to reference the article, too, but it does not count as one of the 3 supporting sources since it IS the source.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center by utilizing the template provided for you in the next post. It is already formatted with the proper headings, margins, and reference page for you.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Remember to change the settings when you review your report to include quoted material to ensure you receive an accurate report of the amount of similar material.

  • Absolutely no more than 20% of your assignment can be from other sources.
  • Highlighted material that comes from use of the template or list of references will NOT count in the overall percentage.
  • You are responsible for checking this.

Apply Rubrics

Evaluating and Selecting Assessments

1
No Submission
0.00%

2
Insufficient
65.00%

3
Approaching
75.00%

4
Acceptable
85.00%

5
Target
100.00%

100.0 %Category

40.0 % Article Summary

Not addressed.

The article is not summarized well.

The article summary requires further development.

Includes a brief summary of the article.

Includes a complete yet succinct summary of the article.

40.0 % Importance of Two Checklist Items

Not addressed.

The defense regarding the particular importance of two checklist items within the context of evaluating assessments is not presented clearly or accurately.

The defense regarding the particular importance of two checklist items within the context of evaluating assessments could be presented better.

A defense regarding the particular importance of two checklist items within the context of evaluating assessments is provided.

A well-argued defence regarding the particular importance of two checklist items within the context of evaluating assessments is provided.

5.0 % Organization

Not addressed.

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.

The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea.

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

5.0 % APA Format and Style Requirements

Not addressed.

References page is present, but citations are inconsistently used.

References page is included. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

References page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a references page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of errors.

10.0 % Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Not addressed.

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present but are not overly distracting to the reader; or inconsistent language or word choice is present; or sentence structure could be more varied.

Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language.

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.

100 % Total Weightage